The Chemical Option: Why Obama Won't Go to War in Syria

Now that Bashar al-Assad has (probably)?crossed the Obama administration's "red line," U.S. officials say "all options are on the table." But you can be pretty sure that a direct attack on Syria isn't one of them. Despite the international?condemnation?that's already coming Assad's way, it's a near?certainty?that the United States will not commit to sending troops into Syria. So what can America do punish the regime?

RELATED: The Syrian Conflict Has a Contagion Problem

Well, the first the thing the White House wants to do is conclusively?establish that Assad is the one responsible. The only hard evidence that sarin nerve gas has been used on the Syrian people comes in the form of?blood samples from the victims that tested positive?for the deadly poison after the main attack in question, last month in Aleppo. Beyond that, American officials and their allies could likely never prove beyond reasonable doubt how the gas got there, when it happened, or who was responsible. There's no reason to doubt the blood samples are authentic, but it's been extremely difficult, for the two years and counting of this bloody conflict, for Western agents to gather intelligence from inside Syria. And what little evidence they do have, well, that would hardly hold up in court.

RELATED: Assad Says Syria 'Is Much Better' Now

It might hold up in the court of public?opinion, but the U.S. can only play the prosecutor?not the judge or jury. The next step is likely to take evidence to the United Nations, where?Russia (and China) have blocked every effort to pass meaningful resolution against Assad. But?chemical?weapons might be the tipping point that forces Vladimir Putin to abandon his old ally, or at least look the other way. (Especially after his tough talk about terrorism today.)?When talking about "red lines," the U.S. isn't talking about what they find acceptable. It's about what the rest of the world simply can't ignore.

RELATED: Russia and China Veto U.N. Resolution on Syria

If Russia and China can be convinced that Syria has finally gone too far, there could be a Security Council resolution. If that happens, the U.S. will probably look to follow the same model it used in Libya in 2011. The best case scenario is the declaration of a no-fly zone, to eventually be enforced by NATO. It's the classic "leading from behind" scenario where the U.S. mobilizes its allies, then let's them do the work.?Britain?and France have already talked about arming the rebels, but they probably won't do so without the force of the United States to?legitimize?their move. With American backing and Russia acceptance (if not support) those other efforts can go forward as well.

RELATED: Weather Gives Syrians a Reprieve, Britain Closes Its Damascus Embassy

It's true the Syrian army and air forces are much more formidable than Mummar Qaddafi's military ever was, but there are other circumstances in the mix?namely:Israel, Lebanon, and Iraq. The use of?chemical?weapons is also a circumstance that didn't exist last time the Obama doctrine really went into effect, and it's one that might make it easier for both the world community and the American public to go along.?It's worth noting that while Republican Congressmen are calling for leadership, they aren't calling for American troops to rush into Damascus. But they are onborad with idea of doing something.

RELATED: Report: Russia Stopped Syria From Gassing Rebels

No matter what happens, it isn't happening in the?immediate?future. The very phrase "red line" is carefully vague, and no one?including President Obama himself?has ever said what the specific?consequences?of crossing that red line would be. Today's letter?from the White House?makes it plain that the U.S. is leery?about making the wrong call, and that the administration?can't go to the U.N. with less than a bulletproof case, no matter what Chuck Hagel and John Kerry say. They don't have a bulletproof case, and maybe not even a shell casing. Even if the U.S. gets everything it can on what appears to be Assad's deadly gas, everything won't be enough for the White House to believe it and go to war. The whole world has to buy this one.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/chemical-option-why-obama-wont-war-syria-194235646.html

MIT Shooting NFL schedule 2013 Boston Explosion West Texas American Airlines Carlos Arredondo Pat Summerall